The last weekend I watched Axone on Netflix. As I do with most of the movies I watch, I wrote on social media what my thoughts emerging from the movie were –

“#axonethefilm is a better representation of the #Discrimination faced by northeastern #Indians than #penalty is. The movie touched a chord. I was heartbroken to see the kind of filth north Indians can throw on anybody who is even slightly different from them.

Delhi subjects them to apathy, judgment & perverse fantasies. I loved the diversity shown. & The movie makes me want to try Axone pork. Rohan Joshi’s acting was superb. #LoveWithoutLimits #DiversityandInclusion #kindness”

This blog post is neither about the movie nor about my social media post. It is about what someone responded to my post.

The person began by pointing out that people from the northeast did not face discrimination only from north Indians. They faced bias in the east, south & west of India too. I was surprised at these statements as nowhere in my post had I written that ‘only’ north Indians discriminated. The movie was based in Delhi & anybody who read my post could see that it was written specifically for the scenarios showed in the movie.

The person then went on to point out that discrimination seemed to come naturally to people irrespective of what region they belonged to. I then asserted that having lived in Delhi NCR, I felt Delhi folks, specially, were unkind to people from anywhere else, in general.

At this, the person went on to defend Delhi without even trying to find out why I said what I did. She insisted ‘discrimination is universal’. That ‘people are capable of great cruelty as well as terrible kindness across lines of region, religion or caste’. That she steers ‘clear of pointing fingers at people of a certain region’. That it was unfair ‘to vilify an entire quarter of the country’.

It was then that I realized it would be pointless to continue this conversation. The person was so blinded in her defense of Delhi/ North India that she downplayed whatever bigotry I had gone through. By saying ‘discrimination is universal’, she effectively said, “all lives matter” or “not all men”.

If discrimination is universal, why do we flinch when whites say, ‘all lives matter’ or when men say, ‘not all men’? We balk because we realize that somebody’s trauma is being moderated. That someone’s right to speak out is being restrained.

I have lived majorly in five cities of which four are in north India. But the only place where I have faced discrimination for being a Bihari has been Delhi. I know people who hid their Bihari status when they first migrated to Delhi. Nowhere else have I been bullied because of my native place.

Nowhere else have I been told I do not look/ sound like a Bihari. Sitting right next to me, an ex-colleague scolded his direct report & said, “Bihari hai Kya?” Our stories are perhaps not as horrifying as those faced by our northeast brethren. But ridicule does affect.

Moreover, a Bihari is a north Indian too. Why then would I want to vilify myself? Or my family & friends who are Bihari’s & consequently north Indians? Because it is not about abusing; it is about admitting there is a problem & trying to solve that problem.

Lastly, a few of my closest friends are Delhi natives. Am I accusing them in the same breath? Even they will recognize the point I am trying to make. & they will not say, “not all Delhiites”.

I completely agree that at every place, kindness & cruelty exist side by side. But I would not, for the life of me, ever say something like a ‘oh south Indians are discriminatory too’ to someone who complains about being traumatized in north India.

Let us please read/ see/ hear/ talk more about discrimination. Specially from survivors to understand the right kind of language to be used in such circumstances.

Yes, all lives matter. Yes, discrimination is universal. Yes, not all men. But not for a survivor! We do not get to define how a survivor should process her/ his trauma…


Discover more from An Ordinary Girl

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Responses to “What Not to Say to Anyone Who’s Faced Discrimination”

  1. Really enjoyed this post. I especially agree with what you said at the end about everyone processing trauma differently because people force others to act in a certain way or try to prove what they are saying wrong very often when it comes to victims which can be really damaging.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much! Like someone gave the analogy during the recent Black Lives Matter movement, if someone’s house is burning, you tell them ‘all houses can burn’…

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I honestly can’t wrap my head around the mindset behind ‘all lives matter’ or ‘not all men’. We can’t make a change in the world if we have to paint everyone with the same brush. It diminishes the experiences of victims while empowering the perpetrators to hide in plain sight. They don’t have to defend themselves, society does it for them. It excuses their actions and allows them to continue their toxic ways. We need to be able to identify individual struggles and situations. If one house on your street was on fire, would you scream ‘all houses matter’ at the firefighters as they battled the flames, or would you recognize that putting out a fire at your neighbours house doesn’t mean your house is any less important?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “It diminishes the experiences of victims while empowering the perpetrators to hide in plain sight.” Exactly! I mean all of us do acknowledge that ‘not all men’ etc. but the moment you say it to a victim, you’re taking away her/ his right to feel the trauma. I just couldn’t believe my eyes when the lady in question went on & on defending those who discriminate based on race/ region in India. Thank you for stopping by, reading my post & sharing your views! :)

      Like

  3. laurabooksandblogs

    When people leave contradictory comments, I think they feel that they’re setting the record straight when really they’re confusing the issue even more. Either they dont get the point of the text, they always have to have the last word, or they just want to shake things up. In any case, there’s no convincing them or anyone else who feels the same way, and they draw attention away from the actual ideas being presented. Continue to hold your ground in your writing, and hopefully the majority of your commenters will know what you’re getting at.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ‘there’s no convincing them’ – there! that nails it!! I’ve given up on social media arguments because people seem to have made their minds up & just don’t want to listen to counter opinions. (Maybe I’m guilty of it too!) But yes, like you said, I hold my ground & even if I don’t get into debates, I usually end up expressing myself through my blog posts. Thank you for stopping by & reading!

      Like

  4. Lauren

    Some people will just pick apart anything and everything you say on social media unfortunately.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. IKR! At times, I feel the need to lash out too but then I remember, “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all”.

      Like

Discover more from An Ordinary Girl

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading